AI Code Review Assistant for Chrome
Review diffs faster on GitHub and GitLab. Claude reads the changes on screen and flags bugs, security issues and missing edge cases.
Why code review slows you down today
Reviewing large pull requests with hundreds of changed files requires hours of focused attention to catch subtle bugs.
Identifying security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and edge cases in code diffs demands deep expertise across multiple domains.
Providing constructive and specific code review feedback takes time to formulate, especially for junior team members' contributions.
Keeping up with a steady stream of pull requests while maintaining code quality standards leads to review bottlenecks.
How Prophet changes code review
Analyzes code diffs on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket to identify potential bugs, security issues, and performance problems.
Suggests specific improvements with refactored code examples rather than just pointing out problems.
Checks for common anti-patterns, missing error handling, and inconsistencies with coding standards visible in the codebase.
Generates structured review comments that are constructive, specific, and actionable for the pull request author.
What Prophet actually does for code review
Prophet is not a chat box that reads pasted text. It works against the live page through Chrome, using the same browser tools every time. Here is the sequence for code review, and the tools it calls at each stage.
1. Reads the diff from the pull request page
Prophet extracts added and removed lines from the GitHub or GitLab diff view with file paths attached.
take_snapshotget_page_content2. Expands the parts GitHub hides
It clicks through collapsed files and "load more" controls so large pull requests are reviewed in full.
click_element_by_uidscroll_pagewait_for_selector3. Leaves the comment for you
Approved review notes can be typed straight into the comment box on the relevant line.
fill_element_by_uidPrompts to try for code review
Open the Prophet side panel on a page where you would normally do code review by hand, then paste one of these in.
“Review this pull request diff and list any potential bugs or security issues you find.”
“What edge cases might this code change miss? Suggest additional test cases.”
“Refactor this function to improve readability and suggest a cleaner approach.”
“Check this code for SQL injection, XSS, and other common security vulnerabilities.”
“Write a constructive code review comment for this change explaining why the current approach might cause issues.”
Other things people do alongside code review
AI Coding Assistant in Chrome
Get coding help on the docs, Stack Overflow or GitHub page you already have open. Claude explains code, suggests fixes and writes snippets.
Learn moreAI Documentation Assistant in Chrome
Write and improve technical documentation faster with Prophet. Generate API docs, user guides, and README files from code and specs in your browser.
Learn moreAI Research Assistant in Chrome
Speed up online research with Prophet. Summarize articles, extract key data, compare sources, and compile findings directly from your browser side panel.
Learn moreChoosing a tool for this
If you are still deciding which extension to use for code review, these compare the options rather than describing one of them.
- Best AI Chrome extensions in 2026 — nine extensions ranked, with free tiers and real prices.
- Best Chrome extensions for Claude AI — the Claude-specific ranking, including which expose Opus 5.
- Best AI sidebar extensions for Chrome — side panel tools compared, and which can act on pages rather than just read them.
- Free Claude AI: every free tier and limit — how far you can get on this workflow without paying anything.
- Step-by-step Prophet guides — walkthroughs for this and the other common workflows.
- Prophet by profession — the same capabilities framed around twelve specific roles.
Ready to Try Prophet for Code Review Assistant?
Install the extension and start using Claude AI in your browser. Free plan available — no credit card required.
Add to Chrome